More on Veriphysics

Of his Veriphysics Vox day writes:

The fullness of the truth cannot be conclusively and comprehensively established from any human perspective or by any human method.

Every partial truth is perceived on a gradiant that depends upon both the perspective and the method utilized to determine it.

Boethius agrees. In “Consolation of Philosophy” book V,iv:

Everything that is known is comprehended not according to it’s own nature, but according to the ability to know of those who do the knowing. Let us make it clear with a brief example: the same roundness of shape is recognized in one way by the sight and in another way by the touch.

Our forefathers had this figured out long, long ago, but in a tantrum and fit of narcissism the “humanists” of the “Enlightenment” threw it away.

Boethius wrote this in 524AD.

Vox Day, being a smart dude is arriving at the correct answers, which have always existed.

5 thoughts on “More on Veriphysics”

    1. There is the visual experience with its visual dynamics recreated in painting and drawing; and sculpture is founded on the tactile experience and its tactile dynamics; and architecture is founded on the kinesthetic: the movement of the body in space and its awareness of that space.
      In the visual, the initial questions are “what are the visual dynamics of seeing?”: “What is darkness?”; “What is light?”; “What is your immediate reaction when the bright light hits you after being in darkness?”; “How far in does the light come?”; more. From these initial psychodynamics of seeing, one develops the formal elements of painting and drawing. The process is the analysis of the subjective experience (of the humanities), not science theory, but experiential knowledge.

      It has been fifty years since I have written this tightly about this; but, I use this way of thinking when I paint and draw.

Leave a Reply to Chris Kleinfelter Cancel Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *